GSD Course Bulletin - Fall 2010

This term's information was last refreshed on 08 MAY 2015 15:47:51.

Courses taught by George L. Legendre

01304: Rising Mass 2 (STU 0130400)

Architecture
Option Studio - 8 credits - Limited enrollment
Monday Thursday 2:00 - 6:00  

Instructor(s)
George L. Legendre

Course Description

Halfway between today's dominant discourse of programmatic freedom and the alleged over-determination of pure form-making, this studio celebrate architecture's ongoing critical return to form. Our interest in the topic of form is neither aesthetic nor ideological. Contrary to the notion of shape (with which it is sometimes confused), form is a syntactic, procedural, and increasingly, technical proposition whose disciplinary autonomy parallels the study of language in the age of structuralism and the more recent development of object-oriented programming in the software industry. In the past five years, our studio briefs have systematically explored the architectural potential of the variable parametric surface, a conceptual vehicle initially chosen for its relentless abstraction and relative resistance to predictable questions of function and architectural figuration. The investigation will continue this fall-in two directions at once.At the near end of the spectrum, in conjunction with the fall term elective offering GSD 2404 Superficial Spaces, we will expand the scope of design experimentation with the production of formal analytic models likely to yield sophisticated , if largely counter-intuitive, building prototypes - later to be incorporated into pragmatic urban and architectural proposals for the island of Manhattan. Rising Mass At the far end of the spectrum we will scavenge a fading trend of global academicism to formulate our instrumental ideas in the context of what was, for a few years, the hottest academic undertaking: planning high-rise structures for the (now) slowing economies of the 21st century. But rather than simply aligning ourselves, even temporarily, with a topical - and now recessive- problem, we will take on frontally the apparent paradox posed by the high-rise type, circa 2000-2010: Why is the architecture of high-rises generally dominated by the structural expressionism of 'iconic' tower design (to the extent that skyscrapers have now become in both East and West the ultimate refuge for signature design and the fulfillment of the architectural ego) when, historically, meeting the demands of the ruthless, semi-automatic technical and commercial demands underpinning this brief ensured that high-rise buildings remained all but a sort of vernacular, a province of specialized craftsmen and consultants, an architecture without architects, as it were, much like the huts of rural Switzerland?Tipped off by Alejandro Zaera Polo's excellent recent analysis of the workings of this artificial design ecology in 'High Rise Phylum 2007'(Harvard Design Magazine, Spring/Summer 2007), we will devise high-rise proposals that express the potentially 'semi-automatic' mode of development advocated in 'High Rise Phylum',as well as the particularities of personal desire. Manhattan 2010Manhattan will be our context of operation. Unlike say, Frankfurt or London, where the themes of high-rise living, working, and development routinely undergo cyclical fortunes of infamy and rehabilitation, the Big Island has been quietly investing in the type for a century and is now witnessing the birth of its Nth generation of high-rises. In this it has been closely following the founding principles of the 'Delirious' way: these include a fondness for 'artificial' and regulated living; a enthusiastic acceptance of high-rise living (which of late includes 'vernacular' adaptations linked to local residential practices); and the fundamental tenet that all programmatic fantasies must remain private, and outward expressiveness strictly banned.At the time of printing we have earmarked several sites released by the City to prospective developers looking to build high (their exact location will be discussed at the beginning of term).We will begin by contributing diagrams and physical models to a collaborative project


GSD iCommons Website


02404: Superficial Spaces (VIS 0240400)

Architecture
Seminar - 4 credits - Limited enrollment
Wednesday 1:00 - 3:00   Gund 508
Wednesday 4:00 - 6:00   Gund 508

Instructor(s)
George L. Legendre

Course Description

At a time when architectural discourse and practice are brimming with references to new geometries, this offering investigates the architectural potential of abstract three-dimensional surfaces. In tandem with the practical ambitions of the option studios, it is intended to help us devise formal prototypes for architectural consumption, while broadening our understanding of the rigours of abstraction and formal analysis.With equal emphasis on theoretical reading, graphic analysis and diagramming, elementary mathematics, numerically controlled fabrication techniques, and theoretical writing, the seminar will circle, in increasingly tight loops, the surface as object of knowledge.Semi-monthly hands-on sessions on modulation and fabrication will supplement a cycle of theoretical readings and discussions, leading to the conception, analysis, calculation, drawing, and making of an intricate superficial structure.Finally the seminar will incorporate a reading sequence of 6 classic texts. There will be one assigned group reading per session, followed by a short presentation and group precept.Precept Reading List Roland Barthes Cy Twombly: Works on Paper in The Responsibility of Forms, pp.157-176, University of California Press Berkeley, 1991 Rosalind Krauss Grids in The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths, The MIT Press, Boston 1986. Peter Eisenman Iconicity and Instrumentality*, Cahiers de L'IRCAM, Instruments, Paris 1995.Erwin Panofsky Contribution to the Problem of Describing The Works of Art and Interpreting Their Contents*. Les Editions de Minuit, Paris, 1975.Greg Lynn New Variations on the Rowe Complex, in Folds Bodies and Blobs, La lettre vole, Brussels 1998. Robert Venturi Some Definitions Using the Comparative Method in Learning From Las Vegas, pp. 87-103, The MIT Press, Cambridge 1972George L. Legendre Shin & I, essay on the ontology of the surface, in AA Files 52, AA Publications, London 2005 Reading List (Optional) George L. Legendre, IJP: The Book of Surfaces, (Architectural Association, 2003).George L. Legendre, JP's Way, in Mathematical Form: John Pickering and the Architecture of the Inversion Principle (Architectural Association, 2006).Prerequisites/Restrictions NoneOther Information1/3 short assignments will help the seminar participants assimilate the basics -and learn new tools. Participation to & preparation for the group reading session is required. A short midterm project will develop into the final submission.Requirements/ Grading PercentagesSemi-Monthly Readings and Assignments: 10% each. Midterm Submission: 20%; Final Project: 50% Meeting First Meeting on Wednesday Sept 1 (Room and Time TBA). Then on Wednesday Sept 8.and on Wednesdays every other week thereafter. (Wednesdays9/22, 10/6, 10/20, 11/3, 11/17, and 12/1).Final Presentation on Wednesday 12/15Location 508 Gund Hall


GSD iCommons Website


Return to FACULTY list · Return to COURSE LISTING